Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Pavelyev's avatar

The Ukrainians definitely should hit Moscow or St. Petersburg NOW. They are generally colder than Kyiv. Very importantly, Moscow residents have suffered little inconvenience from the war so far, and their attitude is extremely important to the government (which is why for a century or so Moscow has had the highest living standards in the USSR/Russia).

Philip MINNS's avatar

Thanks for this update from very cold Ukraine. I am hearing from friends that temperatures this morning in Kyiv are -17c!

Whether Ukraine should strike St. Petersburg and Moscow is indeed an important question. Why shouldn’t there be brutal retaliation against the capital of a country which has always wanted to subjugate Ukraine, from the occupation of 1919 to the Holodomor, the executed Renaissance and the current invasion ? For the first time in history Ukraine has the means to strike back and there must be a powerful temptation to do so.

Strikes against Moscow would also expose Trump’s contradictions.Reports of brutal repression are emerging this morning from Iran, and Trump has said that If this happens, he will hit the regime “very hard”. If he does, he can hardly blame Ukraine for acting likewise against Putin, whose war crimes he has never of course denounced.

The Ukrainians have never stooped to doing to Russia what Russia is doing to them, but in the absence of more robust support for their military campaign from their friends and allies, there must be limits to their forbearance.

122 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?